Reviews (page 7 of 7)
Its like a mix of screaming and Oasis without much else.
Not. For. Me.
Sounds very uninspired. Didn't like it.
Genres will naturally expand, evolve, and become something different from the original creation, a phenomenon witnessed across the entire spectrum of music. A progression that is sometimes natural, but often derivative, cashing in on the trend. Take a look at genres that blew up over the years, and you find this phenomenon occurring across the board. Whether it's hard bop, rebel country, death metal, black metal, or grunge, you can find derivative music that is mostly parts of something else, something worse, the perpetuation of a trend, or bands breaking out with truly unique sounds that capture the entire world. Vine, I am certain that much to their own satisfaction, was called the next Nirvana, or perhaps a resurrected Nirvana, laughable at best. How does one consider a band like the Vines as being out of the ashes of Nirvana? Vines: Highly Evolved is just that —a highly evolved distillation of first-wave American Grunge with Britpop added to the mix, featuring an abundance of "yeah, yeah, yeah" and "oh, oh, oh," along with highly repetitive guitar work and one track that sounds like a smooth brain version of the Clash. Highly Evolved is, if anything, highly manufactured music with pristine production and influence from every song they liked as a child, shoehorned into 43 minutes of unmemorable distillation from far more creative minds. 2002 held some incredible releases, but Highly Derivative is not one of them. A record where the correct music journalists wrote down the correct things to help establish a band that had zero business at that level, demonstrating quite clearly that when the correct keyboard and pen say the correct things, you will find success because you are being arbitrarily pushed to the top. You get the most Nirvana-sounding track on the radio, and the rest is history, obviously. Here we are, twenty-three years later, discussing an album that belongs in Walmart bargain bins. I suggest two records off the top of my head that would be fine substitutes for the Vines album, or a cleansing of the ears through listening to something that holds your interest and is unique. Sonic Youth - Murray St.: Seems sensible to listen to a brilliant return to form and a progenitor of grunge itself. Interpol - Turn on the Bright Lights: Completely original and unique, and also imitated to no end.
This is so generic and uninspiring. Give me duck stab over this any day of the week.
Не чув раніше. По відчуттям альбом не дуже сильно постарів. Відчувається як ок суміш гранжового вокалу (щось середнє між Куртом та Лейном) з гаражним роком. В мене загальне враження "що тут цей альбом робить?", але й треба визнати, що декілька непоганих хітів тут є.
Not my cup of tea at all. Had to abandon listening.
Oh my god I hate this.
Sounds like Nirvana, but not as good.
Very samey. Homesick best track
Btec nirvana
did not need to hear this before i die and don’t you dare compare it to nirvana…yawn
oh no someone dropped Oasis and left it outside for a couple days 😞
++: Sunshinin +: Country Yard, Mary Jane, Ain't No Room, 1969 +-: Highly Evolved, Outtathaway, Get Free, Factory, In the Jungle -: Autumn Shade, Homesick 4,2/10
Even worse than The Strokes. The obvious intentional derivative posturing is like at like AI levels.
Zero interest in this shit
Complete crap
"Get Free" almost keeps this from being a 1/5. But not quite. Why the fuck is this even here?
I can't believe I had to listen to this.
What is this doing here? It’s not in the Dimery book? They probably didn't deserve all the scorn for coming along when the record business decided Rock Was Back and slotted this alongside the Strokes, White Stripes, and all the LES bands. But I mean...cmon.
Kept waiting for something, anything, remotely worth hearing. Still waiting.
"Must hear" LOL 40 days in, first record I haven't finished. I was losing brain cells with every track.
Get free is cool. The rest meh
Yeahhhh very much not my thing. They feel like a cheap parody of a rock band.
Wow this is just awful, really awful. This is even worse than I remember it being. It's musically a dribble of piss.
Hard rock. Pass.
100% background buzz to me. Wikipedia says "The Vines were frequently compared to Nirvana". I totally disagree.
two albums in a row where i’m like. yeah this is music. not much more.
1/5
Listened to this while walking home in a severe thunderstorm at 3am and got pissed that I might get hit by lightning while listening to this bullshit
1+ Stars (3/15)
Naming a record containing 45 mins of the most run of the mill early 2000's rock music 'Highly Evolved' is either beautfiully tongue in cheek or willfully ignorant
No
They're like the modern day Beatles. Shite, if you will
Boring.
trash can
Why do I get the impression, that most of the 'Indie'-Bands are trying to learn their instruments. I think there is a cause for their indipendence - most of the major labels don't want to take the risk. This Album gives me this impression. Beside of learning their instruments, they are seeking verry hard any direction - from pop - balads in some kind of Beatles - style to shouting punk tunes. for me it's absolute clear, that they have nothing to do with the 1001 list
Boring at best. This is an inconsistent mishmash of styles and it's not very well executed. Found myself getting annoyed with these guys. Even after a few listens it never really clicked. I have it on CD, but I won't bother taking it downstairs from the loft.
Highly Evolved Get Free
This entire album just sounds like a grunge record from Nirvana and The Smashing Pumpkins released 10 years too late. Listeners should just stop fucking about and go listen to the real thing. The Vines bring nothing of themselves or originality to this album and therefore it does not belong on this list. There were plenty of bands that were releasing original and vital records in the naughties and this is not one of them; and frankly this lists' record of selecting records from the naughties has been utter shite.
This album is a good reminder of why the British considered throwing tea into a river as one of the highest forms of violence one could commit. Bland, uninteresting record that's indistinguishable from the plethora of other British rock acts from this period who were all trying to be the modern Beatles. There's a song called Mary Jane and guess what the fuck it's about.
why does this guy like pink floyd so much jesus christ don’t know if i even finished this album it was so boring i wanted to kill myself some of the slower songs are not bad, but it doesn’t make up for how basic and unremarkable the rest of this garbage is wish it didn’t suck as much as it did finding very little redeemable or interesting things about any of this ok i’m calling it i don’t think i’ll come back to this, and if i did, i wouldn’t even remember the name of the song i liked the most and i don’t want to wade through audio feces to find gold
no no
Get Free was okay but this was boring at the time and hasn't got more interesting with age. Possibly the low point of early 00s NME barrel scraping - at least the Libertines had the occasional melody .
Ok
Like a lesser Stone Temple Pilots... which is like saying, "Worse than sucks."
A while ago 1001 generated Ash:1977. This album is more garage rock and has even worse songwriting.
Not really my type of music. Favorite track: Factory
Langweiliger Rock
Unbearable. Generic early 2000 indie rock. Hated it back then still hate it now
Rock muy basicon de los 2000. Bajísima calidad, todo ruido. Un Green Day pedorrisimo.
I tried to find a redeeming quality in this music. Too bitter I lost 45 min of my life. 1/5
forgettable
Not in the mood
Meh
Det här är ju bra trist.
Highly dull.
Hey album, what are you doing on this list? No one, certainly not the critics (4.1 by Pitchfork), finds you remarkable. No problem you exist and that some persons like you, but to me you're just another 1.5 hours (two spins) waisted by very mediocre rock. Now I feel like a bully, but I'm just being honest.
The only comparison to Nirvana they deserve is that I'd rather take a shotgun to the head than listen to this worse-than-Bush grunge parody'
Oh man this record rubs me the wrong way. Its way too shouty and quite annoying.
Highly bad. Been six days since I heard this and the memory has the sensational impact of a stale eggy fart.
Take a slice of Nirvana, cook it in a Britpop sauce (part Blur, part Oasis), sprinkle with abundant portions of psychedelia and early 2000s garage rock (à la The Strokes), and what you get is a predictable "indie" success at the time this one came out. The thing is, none of those great ingredients gel or interact in any sort of cohesive or satisfactory manner in *Highly Evolved*. I felt it at the time, and I feel it even more now. Worse, there are quite a few embarassing moments in this LP. The verses of "Factory" sound like Paul McCartney circa 1975 playing a ska song. Should I really need to say more? I mean *really*??? Two things ruin this record overall: first the transitions between the different sorts of songs are absolutely jarring. Sometimes topsy-turvy albums have their charms. Here, unfortunately, the stylistic 180-degree turns are just awkward. Yet the *real* problem is that the songs are themselves pretty lame, even taken on their own. The chord successions are unoriginal and predictable. The compositions are boring. Long tracks have grating vocal lines that meander aimlesly, and short tracks feel half-cooked. Only the rockers "Get Free" and "Highly Evolved" are fully enjoyable--mostly through the energy that's displayed in those Nirvana and The Strokes rip-offs... Too bad those two decent cuts are not enough to save this record from disaster. On their strength, I could have been led to believe the album was somewhat even remotely interesting. Glad I didn't fall into that trap at the time. And also glad that I could listen to that thing again. Sometimes, as you get older and broaden your tastes, you end up changing your mind about some acts. But not in here, and not me. 1/5 for the purposes of this list of "essential" albums. Which translates to something between a 4/10 and a 6/10 grade for more general purposes, such as assessing the hard work made a professional band. Hey, it's still better than the 1 or 2/10 mark I would give to Limp Bizkit, at least. Next please. 😏 Number of albums left to review: 533 Number of albums from the list I find relevant enough to be mandatory listens: 224 Albums from the list I *might* include in mine later on: 108 Albums from the list I will certainly *not* include in mine (many others are more essential to me): 136 (including this one)
Nothing in it really caught my ear